A briefing paper for a child health promotion project Essay

A briefing paper for a child health promotion project - Essay Example Mothers are also protected from osteoporosis, ovarian cancer and breast cancer. It has also helped them maintain weight. (WHO, 2001) The aim of this paper is to present a proposal of establishing a Breastfeeding Center in UK which opens daily in daytime and which holds antenatal breastfeeding education classes. This projects aims on (1.) Encouraging breastfeeding and (2) Examining the effectiveness of current measures to promote breastfeeding. This proposal is being presented to stakeholders who will approve this proposal, such as the UK National Health Services Maternal and Child Health programme. The proponent is ______________ (your qualification) This proposal seeks to establish a breastfeeding center in UK which is accessible to most women in the area—accessible to their workplace or their homes. This center should be staffed by a Lactation consultant who would offer her services in communicating with mothers and families. The center should have a relaxed atmosphere so that mothers can truly benefit from the breastfeeding learning experience. The center should also provide care for pregnant women, which includes relaxation massage for women, pregnancy massage, baby massage classes, lactation consultancy for breastfeeding support and gifts for mothers and babies. This service should be provided free of charge for women and should be open from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM. The center should also offer free lactation stay services for women who want to breastfeed their babies for longer periods. The center should also hold antenatal breastfeeding education classes which are essential for successful breastfeeding to occur. There should be education related to breastfeeding and the participants should have access to educational materials and hands-on experience with dolls. The participants should be comfortable and have a

Human Rights and English law (LLB) Without security there can be no Essay

Human Rights and English law (LLB) Without security there can be no liberty Discuss, with particular reference to the legislative measures on terrorism since - Essay Example Today, terrorism has become almost part of our lives. People are simultaneously worried about security and individual freedom. Politicians are worried about both too. We can see the contrast between the Labour Party Manifesto and the aftermath: â€Å"Citizens should have statutory rights to enforce their human rights in the UK courts. We will by statute incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law to bring these rights home and allow our people access to them in their national courts. The incorporation of the European Convention will establish a floor, not a ceiling, for human rights. [emphasis added] : 1997 Labour Party’s General Election Manifesto. Erosion of Human Rights started with the fight against terrorism. There is also an added fear that erosion of human rights could be counter productive. People detained under harsh conditions, on the basis of secret accusations, which they could not refute, harassed or tortured could create a backlash in the society. But can the country risk its security in the name of freedom? If so, how far can it go without endangering itself? How much protection can security agencies offer without additional powers and how safe are these draconian powers? Which is more important, liberty or security of the nation? Since September 11th, 2001, Government passed many laws, even though there were toughest laws in place already. Crime and Disorder Act of 1998, Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act, 1999, Regulation Investigatory power Act, 2000, Terrorism Act 2000, Anti Terrorism, Crime and Security Act, 2001, Criminal Justice and Police Act, 2001, Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, Criminal Justice Act, 2003, Asylum and Immigration Act, 2004, and Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2005 are the various laws made for the security of citizens and properties of United Kingdom and there is no doubt that they infringe on the personal liberty of citizens. â€Å"We are particularly